You are welcome to debate me on any subject if you can avoid false promise, baiting into hazard, unwarrantable speech, advanced by Pilpul, defended by Critique and GSRRM, and preference or face over truth. But then, that would require masculinity in body, intuition and mind. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-04 20:49:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1257411941544402944
Reply addressees: @Lasagna4all
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1257411121952296960
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Lasagna4all a) You didn’t make a criticism, you just used empty GSRRM. (Female>Jewish>Marxist Critique) as a substitute for argument. b) The tweet is out of context. In context:”How would we state Dumizel’s Trifunctionalism in trifunctional prose so that it could be embedded in a preamble.”
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1257411121952296960
Leave a Reply