This is the difference between scriptural and legal interpretation (excuse making) under an author’s anonymity, rather than testimony.
Statment’s aren’t true or false.
People speak incoherently, undecidably, truthfully, or falsely.
(The disease of mathematics and platonism.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 01:45:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243715870070882304
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243715248529555456
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K But because both statements are written by human intention using incomplete (grammatically incorrect) statements, absent a subject, they deceptions. The deception is made possible by appeal to suggestion, requiring inference. All sophisms use this technique.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243715248529555456
Leave a Reply