Grammar = “Rules of continuous recursive disambiguation.”
Ergo, the liars paradox in all forms consists of nothing more than an intentional use ambiguity in making a promise. In other words: a lie.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 01:15:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243708252036136960
Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243702933964849152
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K So again, this is a sophism. There is no paradox to in the liars box. People say things, and mean what they say. The liar’s paradox (as kripke, godel et all addressed), is not a paradox – it is a deception that takes advantage of grammatical fragility in ordinary speech.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243702933964849152
Leave a Reply