You see, I understand your theological substitution. I always have. I just haven

You see, I understand your theological substitution. I always have. I just haven’t taken the time to fully entrap you in demonstrating it.

The only way to falsify P is to run cases: tests. All you will discover is undecidability (testimony), where you find falsehood (inference).


Source date (UTC): 2020-03-27 14:27:03 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243545071791886338

Reply addressees: @AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243544325344169989


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@AboveIvan @KANTBOT20K How can you make a case for logic in anything other than logic?

The fact that you counter signal closure when there is none w/o the full spectrum of falsifications (in P) puts a lie to the whole thing you call ‘rationalism’.
You never seek to understand. That’s why you fail.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1243544325344169989

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *