photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86454340_209116643819830_60600038330

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86454340_209116643819830_6060003833075990528_n_209116640486497.jpg @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes] You or one of the guys want to answer this (i have him blocked because he’s a nutcase.)

P’s position on interest is that it must meet terms of reciprocity, and therefore must contribute to production, and cannot constitute rent seeking on consumption. Ergo, commercial loans are fine for production, but prohibited on consumption. As such P recommends nationalizing consumer credit at no interest, and maintaining commercial credit for production.

The only oddity I didn’t predict here is that is prohibits private development of rental units which results in answering the human-farming position of the georgists. However, it’s pretty clear that the germans and french have done a better job than the americans in zoning urban construction for families rather than zoning for small apartments. The question is whether we should zone for multigenerational condos instead – at the cost of prohibiting multi-family occupation of multi-generational flats.

As for fiat currency P’s position is to use multiple currencies (completing the transformation to stocks in the economy as token money), and distributing liquidity (the money supply) directly to citizens (consumers) to spend as they will, forcing business and finance to compete for consumer wealth. This program eliminates most rent seeking by financial means. Combined with prohibition on baiting into hazard, (so prohibition on consumer interest, prohibition on rent seeking prohibition on baiting into hazard, and stiff requirements for public speech (advertising) we should get rid of most violations of reciprocity made possible under financialism, and restore the middle class’s ability to benefit rather than be exploited by the top and bottom against the middle.Brandon Hayes You or one of the guys want to answer this (i have him blocked because he’s a nutcase.)

P’s position on interest is that it must meet terms of reciprocity, and therefore must contribute to production, and cannot constitute rent seeking on consumption. Ergo, commercial loans are fine for production, but prohibited on consumption. As such P recommends nationalizing consumer credit at no interest, and maintaining commercial credit for production.

The only oddity I didn’t predict here is that is prohibits private development of rental units which results in answering the human-farming position of the georgists. However, it’s pretty clear that the germans and french have done a better job than the americans in zoning urban construction for families rather than zoning for small apartments. The question is whether we should zone for multigenerational condos instead – at the cost of prohibiting multi-family occupation of multi-generational flats.

As for fiat currency P’s position is to use multiple currencies (completing the transformation to stocks in the economy as token money), and distributing liquidity (the money supply) directly to citizens (consumers) to spend as they will, forcing business and finance to compete for consumer wealth. This program eliminates most rent seeking by financial means. Combined with prohibition on baiting into hazard, (so prohibition on consumer interest, prohibition on rent seeking prohibition on baiting into hazard, and stiff requirements for public speech (advertising) we should get rid of most violations of reciprocity made possible under financialism, and restore the middle class’s ability to benefit rather than be exploited by the top and bottom against the middle.