The test(s) yield(s) an almost infinite set of numbers. But aside from verbal and spatial-temporal, and the obvious gender bias in that dimension – they all scale together. Thats why they report on the one number (g) and it’s distribution (verbal-spatial).
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 08:11:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216633869795053568
Reply addressees: @ovjocm @JayWamsted @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216346435119022080
IN REPLY TO:
@ovjocm
@JayWamsted @charlesmurray I’ll assume that result is true unless someone educates me otherwise. Even so, I don’t get your point.
A better test would yield 3 numbers. Tests yielding 1 IQ number would still exist and IQ would still correlate with wealth and educability. Did anything important change?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216346435119022080
Leave a Reply