Speaking a lie does not require intent, but a failure of due diligence not to li

Speaking a lie does not require intent, but a failure of due diligence not to lie. Speaking the truth does not require one intends to. Intent determines punishment, harm does not, and so restitution does not. Difference between permisssive ingroup moral and scientific judicial.


Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 11:03:58 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206892789478371328

Reply addressees: @james__jenko

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206712992437592064


IN REPLY TO:

@james__jenko

@curtdoolittle The 1st simple example of an irrational assertion would be that I lied (just because I haven’t expanded on the accusation is not the same as a lie). Considering your a fairly intelligent guy and probably understand that, one could reasonably conclude that you just lied.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206712992437592064

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *