So, the reason for “productive” is to prevent such as blackmail, “fully informed” to prevent fraud by omission, and “warrantied” for baiting into hazard, and within limits of restitution – to limit export of risk, and externalities, to force due diligence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 04:58:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206438410665283586
Reply addressees: @Abhiman11678846
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206437638128984064
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Abhiman11678846 There is however a test of due diligence – which is what we do every day, and why we have insurance and regulation (prior constraint), and actuarial data. That said, we hold people accountable for their actions regardless. just requiring only restitution – not punishment.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206437638128984064
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Abhiman11678846 There is however a test of due diligence – which is what we do every day, and why we have insurance and regulation (prior constraint), and actuarial data. That said, we hold people accountable for their actions regardless. just requiring only restitution – not punishment.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206437638128984064
Leave a Reply