And that is how it must be, because only choice is subjective and justificationary. All else objective and falsificationary.
Ergo almost nothing remains in philosophy that is not but another therapeutic theology other than choice.
Which is fine. We need a philosophy of choice.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 11:53:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206542920460972032
Reply addressees: @YvesBurri
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206542207009918981
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@YvesBurri If the 20th c. attempt to define the sci. method failed, then how do you know that w/o a definition of science or its method? Like all other previous branches of left for science, truth departs into sci. of Testimony, & Ethics to reciprocity. Only choice remains in philosophy.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206542207009918981
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@YvesBurri If the 20th c. attempt to define the sci. method failed, then how do you know that w/o a definition of science or its method? Like all other previous branches of left for science, truth departs into sci. of Testimony, & Ethics to reciprocity. Only choice remains in philosophy.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206542207009918981
Leave a Reply