2) Copyright has inverted investment in the arts from aristocratic, heroic, and

2) Copyright has inverted investment in the arts from aristocratic, heroic, and capitalizing to underclass, victimhood, and hyper consumption and hedonism. Arts like any market follow incentives, and these incentives are to the worst possible of all incentives.


Source date (UTC): 2019-12-14 18:28:52 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205917586107617282

Reply addressees: @waspuppet

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205917124310515714


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@waspuppet 1) Patents and Copyrights are subsidies, like welfare, Rent Seeking, or Corruption. While Trademarks are weights and measures. Creative commons solves this problem by requiring compensation for commercial use but not personal consumption.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1205917124310515714


IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@waspuppet 1) Patents and Copyrights are subsidies, like welfare, Rent Seeking, or Corruption. While Trademarks are weights and measures. Creative commons solves this problem by requiring compensation for commercial use but not personal consumption.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1205917124310515714

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *