And the next is not to pander to them, or the pretense that postwar art is criti

And the next is not to pander to them, or the pretense that postwar art is critique (undermining) is any different from the idiot in the meeting who reminds us of some obvious pedantry for attention, and contributes nothing except friction to development of innovations.


Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 15:22:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200434940241948673

Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200434687715545088


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@KillerkattArt @DegenRolf Now the next step is to explore the difference between creators who understand their CRAFT as a set of those techniques, for evoking human experience (actors, directors and editors the best current examples). And those who merely fantasize that they’re not self-pleasuring.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200434687715545088


IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@KillerkattArt @DegenRolf Now the next step is to explore the difference between creators who understand their CRAFT as a set of those techniques, for evoking human experience (actors, directors and editors the best current examples). And those who merely fantasize that they’re not self-pleasuring.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200434687715545088

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *