So it’s not that one needs to determine whether something is true, its whether someone can demonstrate the knowledge to make a truth claim (satisfy market demand for infallibility in the given question, given the consequences.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:19:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198773143688687616
Reply addressees: @balajis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198772560852336640
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@balajis This subject is over your head I think. 😉 Closure is UNNECESSARY IN FALSIFICATION. The grammar of positional names (math) is trivial compared to the grammar of human operations (thought, display, word, and deed). You don’t ascertain truth, you ascertain falsehood.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198772560852336640
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@balajis This subject is over your head I think. 😉 Closure is UNNECESSARY IN FALSIFICATION. The grammar of positional names (math) is trivial compared to the grammar of human operations (thought, display, word, and deed). You don’t ascertain truth, you ascertain falsehood.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198772560852336640
Leave a Reply