Computers can however, falsify better than people can, in everything except subjective testing of rational incentives. If law, and findings of law, were stated correctly instead of archaically, we could use findings of the court as we do wikipedia.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 01:27:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198775104295059457
Reply addressees: @balajis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198774762039914496
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@balajis So like many people you are still as confused as everyone else that didn’t learn from Popper or the failure of 20th century philosophy (dead end) and the failure of the search for a via-positiva scientific method. There isn’t any such thing. Human language is Open (no closure).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198774762039914496
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@balajis So like many people you are still as confused as everyone else that didn’t learn from Popper or the failure of 20th century philosophy (dead end) and the failure of the search for a via-positiva scientific method. There isn’t any such thing. Human language is Open (no closure).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198774762039914496
Leave a Reply