And no, it doesn’t mean ‘beyond the physics’, that’s just a later classification

And no, it doesn’t mean ‘beyond the physics’, that’s just a later classification of that scope of work, because it came after the physics in the order of aristotle’s work. Not because it was ‘beyond the physics.’..


Source date (UTC): 2019-11-15 14:31:23 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195348573740769282

Reply addressees: @rohansharan

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1195348288817573889


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@rohansharan So yes, as far as we know, a particle consists of a density of energy in a state of equilibrium at a given charge. And that what we describe as wave forms, appears to consist of some underlying geometry we haven’t quite determined as yet. That’s physics.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1195348288817573889


IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@rohansharan So yes, as far as we know, a particle consists of a density of energy in a state of equilibrium at a given charge. And that what we describe as wave forms, appears to consist of some underlying geometry we haven’t quite determined as yet. That’s physics.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1195348288817573889

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *