^This is a very, very good example of P-Law’s disambiguating terms that have been used to lie: by conflating rights, privileges, and rights to suit in violation of either.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 15:23:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188838590169731075
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188838159448236037
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays Rights to not exist in nature. Only possibilities. We MAKE rights.We can only make negative rights,because we can only refrain equally not DO equally. We can construct PRIVILEGES (not rights), in a polity. And we can grant the right of SUIT if those privileges or rights violated.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188838159448236037
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays Rights to not exist in nature. Only possibilities. We MAKE rights.We can only make negative rights,because we can only refrain equally not DO equally. We can construct PRIVILEGES (not rights), in a polity. And we can grant the right of SUIT if those privileges or rights violated.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188838159448236037
Leave a Reply