Difference is that no contract of the commons may violate the law of reciprocity, so everything must be constructed as a contract – not legislation – with a full accounting.
Also there is no ‘general fund’ and no ‘pooling and laundering’ of revenues. And all contracts terminate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 17:53:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188514084314079232
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188513805682270209
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Then, again we list the choices: either top down proposal by a monarchy, or cabinet, and public opportunity to veto. Middle down; Or bottom up; market for contracts of the commons, by equal or proportional vote, equal or proportional contribution; or a combination of.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188513805682270209
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Then, again we list the choices: either top down proposal by a monarchy, or cabinet, and public opportunity to veto. Middle down; Or bottom up; market for contracts of the commons, by equal or proportional vote, equal or proportional contribution; or a combination of.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188513805682270209
Leave a Reply