So I would say Hayek is speaking forgivingly, you tolerantly, and me prosecutorially. Why? Because I don’t interpret the Left’s destruction of the west in any discipline as accidental, or the Right’s failure in defense either – both because they were insufficiently Aristotelian.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 11:46:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180811568013074439
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180810567226990593
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PoseidonAwoke Yes, and I call it a period of pseudoscience, innumeracy, and sophism – the difference between Hayek, you, and I, is just historical analogy(him), category(you), and specific technique(me). We could say “Making Excuses” and still convey the same understanding.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180810567226990593
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@PoseidonAwoke Yes, and I call it a period of pseudoscience, innumeracy, and sophism – the difference between Hayek, you, and I, is just historical analogy(him), category(you), and specific technique(me). We could say “Making Excuses” and still convey the same understanding.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180810567226990593
Leave a Reply