This is a simple economic problem of consumption vs investment.Historically you invested in a woman because they live longer accumulate less cellular damage and can provide you with reciprocal care as you age. With destruction of family this investment no longer provides returns.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 03:21:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179234872730275841
Reply addressees: @FreeNortherner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179233832677117952
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@FreeNortherner No, its because age and fertility in females is a luxury good, and younger women have simple ambitions that don’t force men to compromise theirs. Women are costly which is why polygamy is common but unaffordable for all but a few. So it’s simply a better trade than older women.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179233832677117952
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@FreeNortherner No, its because age and fertility in females is a luxury good, and younger women have simple ambitions that don’t force men to compromise theirs. Women are costly which is why polygamy is common but unaffordable for all but a few. So it’s simply a better trade than older women.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179233832677117952
Leave a Reply