(using series – which is what I teach – disambiguates and prevents errors of conflation when using ideal types and fallacies of construction such as ‘principles’.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 15:31:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179056257501683713
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179056053885063168
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@fryskefilosoof 1. Returning violence is and act of reciprocity.
2. Forcing Restitution and if necessary punishment (disincentive for repetition), restores reciprocity.
3. Preemptive violence insures against ir-reciprocity.
(Always use a series of at least 3 to 5 when analyzing propositions.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179056053885063168
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@fryskefilosoof 1. Returning violence is and act of reciprocity.
2. Forcing Restitution and if necessary punishment (disincentive for repetition), restores reciprocity.
3. Preemptive violence insures against ir-reciprocity.
(Always use a series of at least 3 to 5 when analyzing propositions.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179056053885063168
Leave a Reply