Now you might argue it’s limited to within the Hajnal line, where manorialism provided heavy selection pressure, and I might agree, that the superiority is limited largely to lotharingia and the hajnal line. (trade routes) and then finally the north sea. These are true.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 14:47:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177595666979315717
Reply addressees: @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177595404029956104
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme So white superiority is simply true. It is true because of greater neoteny but less than east asians, lower clannishness, greater symmetry of dimorphism, superior class distribution to the middle, and far, far, superior traditions, culture, and institutions – no comparison.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177595404029956104
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme So white superiority is simply true. It is true because of greater neoteny but less than east asians, lower clannishness, greater symmetry of dimorphism, superior class distribution to the middle, and far, far, superior traditions, culture, and institutions – no comparison.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177595404029956104
Leave a Reply