It’s exasperating that a hole in our constitution that neither demands ascent of the supreme court, nor demands warranty by its legislators, nor provides means of returning an undecidable case to the state, is obfuscated by discussions of independence instead.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:42:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174076257140649985
Reply addressees: @JoshMBlackman @CatoInstitute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174075760807677952
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JoshMBlackman @CatoInstitute But judicial independence is a consequence of that one law of reciprocity. Government is just a means of producing commons under that law. And the insurance of that law, those judges, against that government and the people who would usurp it, the only insurance possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174075760807677952
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@JoshMBlackman @CatoInstitute But judicial independence is a consequence of that one law of reciprocity. Government is just a means of producing commons under that law. And the insurance of that law, those judges, against that government and the people who would usurp it, the only insurance possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174075760807677952
Leave a Reply