5) signs compete in a market of competing paradigms. 6) paradigms need not be consistent nor correspondent, only associative, indexing a narrative or it’s elements. 7) signs hide ignorance under pretense of knowledge. 8) language facility is not vocalization dependent.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:19:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173481447119888385
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173480946634502144
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Semiogogue 1) Indices 2) We remember novelties, novelties with more associations. 3)Trying to justify the frame and rationalist interpretation of it rather than the science. 4)Inventory and categorize signs and symbols as indices to narrative components instead.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173480946634502144
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Semiogogue 1) Indices 2) We remember novelties, novelties with more associations. 3)Trying to justify the frame and rationalist interpretation of it rather than the science. 4)Inventory and categorize signs and symbols as indices to narrative components instead.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173480946634502144
Leave a Reply