INTERESTING OBSERVATION. Posting material from 10 years ago. Not sure it’s helpf

INTERESTING OBSERVATION.

Posting material from 10 years ago. Not sure it’s helpful. Still testing it. Reason? I’d rather keep it all FB and drive people to the Blog then the Institute.

But here is an interesting observation:

When I started writing a lot in 2009, I wrote almost entirely about economics – just as the influence economists had on policy came to an end (the failure of mainstream economics in political theory.) I thought I would build an audience doing little more than daily falsifying claims by left leaning economists.

Around that same time I was working on a draft of the constitution and hit the problem of epistemology because it wasn’t possible to write a constitution without saying what a falsehood consisted of.

I spent most of my time on that series of problems working from what we all call metaphysics today (what I call grammars) on up through the skeleton of aristotelian categories (philosophical) by merging them with scientific and legal categories.

Sorta got stuck on religion and really had the problem figured out by last summer, but has taken me the past year to test and define a solution to it, and put it into our institutions. Religion really was the hard problem of social science – and it still is the primary impediment to restoring western civilization.

After 2016 work is mostly about natural law and constitution. Stuff that burned me out was the constitution. And rewriting the first part of the book last fall. I dont’ know why I”m more productive in spring and fall. no idea.

John and I have been working the revolutionary angle since last fall (2018). My original intention (2012) was to de-christianize libertarianism (rule of law) by restoring the dirty word “force “(or violence) to the discourse on rule of law, thereby prohibiting men from claiming virtue without warranty of insuring it with risk and force. This was an attempt to overturn rothbard and hoppe’s ‘pussytarian’ libertarianism, and restore anglo saxon rule of law of sovereign men, not liberty(Permission for local jurisdiction), or freedom (Permission to enter the market for goods, services, and labor).

SUMMARY

I have seen our country go from debate over economic means of administration to the verge of another civil war in just ten years, and I know that the answer is the acceleration under the Obama administration, and the general left’s presumption it would win due to third world immigration legal and illegal, despite the failure of its ideas.