I think you are confusing yourselves. (a) epigenetic effects are minimal, and li

I think you are confusing yourselves.

(a) epigenetic effects are minimal, and limited to expression of proteins, by the alteration of tags, but these tags are removed prior to dna division between sperm and egg. There are some patterns of intergenerational transfer of defects given poor ancestral nutrition, but we have no idea if such tags are the cause (that I know of).

(b) to make the claim ‘genetic’, where genes produce proteins, which as a consequence provide resources to cells, serves only as a demarcation between genetic information, in utero development, early childhood development (prior to age two) and subsequent LEARNING (training).

(c) for example, vulnerability to homosexuality (a developmental disorder) is genetic; it’s expression is dependent upon in utero conditions; and if not immediately expressed, it can be triggered by developmental trauma.

in other words, in the nature, developmental, nurture debate, genetic means deterministic result of the random sortition of mother and father gene formation, and subsequent gene expression – and therefore ‘not something we can do much about’.

Disambiguation in everything.