So aside from (a) demonstrating you’re a fool by demand for an authority, (b) by doing so admitting you’re incompetent to judge, (c) feigning falsehood when you’re disapproving, and (d) making a statement contrary to the empirical evidence of his popularity – what have you got?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-01 17:40:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1156983130332585984
Reply addressees: @Berderking @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1156982631315267591
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Berderking @StefanMolyneux Conversely,what qualifies you to disagree? One can never believe an authority, unless you’re a fool. One can falsify or not, or propose a more parsimonious argument or not. One can falsify a preference or not by demonstrating involuntary transfer of costs either direction or not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1156982631315267591
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Berderking @StefanMolyneux Conversely,what qualifies you to disagree? One can never believe an authority, unless you’re a fool. One can falsify or not, or propose a more parsimonious argument or not. One can falsify a preference or not by demonstrating involuntary transfer of costs either direction or not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1156982631315267591
Leave a Reply