@Euroslam —“you do not understand dictatorship”— Dictatorship refers to rule

@Euroslam

—“you do not understand dictatorship”—

Dictatorship refers to rule by discretion of an individual. See? That was easy.

—“you do not conflate monarchy with the overarching ideology”—
Um. i correctly disambiguate western monarchy under western law which limits the king as much as the people, and you attempt to equate discretionary rule of more primitive peoples with rule of law of western peoples. This is the foundation of western civilization. It is not the foundation of any other civilization. For reasons I’ve explained in depth a hundred times.

—“Dictatorship is … absolute rule of a leader, [ translated: the means of production of goods, services, information and institutions does not matter]”—

Correct, and that is not monarchy. Only the west had kings(pagans) and monarchs (christianity), others had chieftains, rulers, and emperors. We did not invent terms to disambiguate the west from the less developed peoples.

We fought many european wars to prevent the disease the Alexander found in the east from infecting our people. The abrahamic religions and the church were the second attempt to invade the west with the disease of the east. This is becaue the intelligence and level of neoteny in the east was lower than the west. The western man was capable of sovereignty and the eastern slave is not.

—“So [define] non-dictatorship monarchy.”—
European monarchy. Rule of law. Wherein the ruler is bound by the same law as the people – first among equals, producer of commons, and judge of last resort. A ‘decider of last resort’. Where in the monarchy runs the polity as a business, where his rewards are taxes, that allow him to invest (go to war) for additional territories (compete).

—“[islam will prevail]”—
Well islam is a cancer upon mankind, just like judaism, christianity. Does cancer prevail? Only as long as it has a host. It took a long time for Muslims to run out of hosts to survive parasitically upon. And the west defeated them with a trivial number of forces each time the chose to. Why would the west not defeat them again, this time? I mean, the only reason we don’t exterminate them all is simply good manners.

I’m providing the cure for cancer: all the abrahamic breeds of cancer.

The only reason there is any islam in the west today is women voters.
Just like the only reason there was any judaism in the west – female whores.
Just like the only reason christianity got a foothold in the west – weak willed women.

The problem is easily fixed.
The anglo germanic civilization will persist.
Islam, no longer protected by christians, will be contained by the great forces of every other civilization.
And that is the future.
Why? Because islam only expands today by tolerance of christian women in the west.
And that problem is easily (shortly) fixed.