So appealing additionally to the empirical, operational, limits and completeness, what case violates necessity of surviving internal consistency, correspondence, operational possibility, limits and completeness (full accounting) – and coherence if possible? Find one.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-07 20:45:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137098301742944256
Reply addressees: @Prussian_Reborn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137097317205651457
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Prussian_Reborn Well, that’s not true because there is no closure, right? There is no rational (logical) closure, so one must appeal to cases (the empirical). Hence the triviality(sophistry) of ideals (rationalism) and the necessity for consistency, correspondence, operationalism, completeness.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1137097317205651457
Leave a Reply