photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53708748_10157047939917264_259080033

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53708748_10157047939917264_259080033681801216_o_10157047939912264.jpg THE PERIODIC TABLE OF SPEECH

There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism

1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence

2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars)

3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime

4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation)

5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests).

-update-

(correct link to pdf version:

https://propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/periodic-table-of-speech-draft2.pdf )Jared NeavesNiceMar 14, 2019, 11:18 AMCurt DoolittleLINK AT THE BOTTOM.Mar 14, 2019, 11:21 AMJared NeavesCurt Doolittle 😂 🙊Mar 14, 2019, 11:21 AMVengefül BobmoranUm… can’t read it on the website.Mar 14, 2019, 11:31 AMJWarren Prescottcould you do it in pdf – png is not showing up. 🙂Mar 14, 2019, 11:33 AMScott SchroederThe portion of Propertarianism dealing with punishment for lies sounds a lot like my concept of political fraud. Political fraud is akin to economic fraud. In economic fraud, you lie for material gain. In political fraud, you lie for political gain. We can define political fraud as “Deliberate material misstatement of fact for political gain” and make it punishable both criminally and civilly.Mar 14, 2019, 11:37 AMMartin Štěpánhttps://i0.wp.com/propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Screen-Shot-2019-03-14-at-10.57.27-AM.pngMar 14, 2019, 11:44 AMMartin Štěpánhttps://i0.wp.com/propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Screen-Shot-2019-03-14-at-10.57.27-AM.pngMar 14, 2019, 11:45 AMBryan Nova BreyMassive undertaking and achievement! Is this why you were talking about “normalization of tables” a few days ago?

Would help if you could make a higher resolution screenshot. I zoom in and can read the headings only.Mar 14, 2019, 12:40 PMBryan Nova BreyI can zoom just a bit more than this.Mar 14, 2019, 12:41 PMCurt Doolittlelink at bottom of post to full size pdf – poster

yes as to why teach normalization.Mar 14, 2019, 12:50 PMBryan Nova BreyMartin Štěpán This one is higher resolution. Thanks!Mar 14, 2019, 12:54 PMMartin ŠtěpánBryan Nova Brey It’s just the one from the site without resize.Mar 14, 2019, 12:55 PMMartin ŠtěpánCurt DoolittleIt links to the site. There’s no pdf.Mar 14, 2019, 12:56 PMJames HolidayWow this is pretty amazing. You can use this to chart any argument and show the methods of argumentation and their truthfulness. Looks like a great tool for persuasion/argument as well as law

Is it all finished though? I see some question marks and empty boxes.Mar 14, 2019, 12:56 PMBryan Nova BreyMartin Štěpán I went to the site on mobile. I held down the image to save it. The version that I saved was not fully readable. Likely this is a mobile problem.Mar 14, 2019, 12:56 PMMartin ŠtěpánBryan Nova Brey You’ve saved the resized version.Mar 14, 2019, 12:57 PMBryan Nova BreyOn mobile, on the link provided in the OP there is no choice for image size (resolution) to download. Your link however goes directly to the full size, which I was able to download.Mar 14, 2019, 12:59 PMMartin ŠtěpánBryan Nova Brey Yes. I just deleted “?resize=768%2C492&ssl=1” from the url.Mar 14, 2019, 1:00 PMCurt Doolittleyep. its fking awesome.

um no, not finished. i would have to do more research and truthfully i’m not sure i need to. the point of the diagram is that like the elements, speech reflects the real world in predictable ways..Mar 14, 2019, 1:03 PMBryan Nova BreyMartin Štěpán Brilliant.

I don’t get the option to open in a new tab on mobile.Mar 14, 2019, 1:04 PMCurt Doolittlefixed. link at top of post on siteMar 14, 2019, 1:06 PMBryan Nova BreyThere were empty slots in the original periodic table. 🤓Mar 14, 2019, 1:11 PMCurt Doolittlesame reason here….Mar 14, 2019, 1:12 PMCurt Doolittlelink in op to pdfMar 14, 2019, 1:20 PMJWarren PrescottWow, much better…👍🏻Mar 14, 2019, 1:21 PMDanny VögelmeierBasically one needs to convince A that (1-A) needs to be deported.

That’s why the nazis were stressing german superiority. German descent was something everyone could easily verify (and which was compatible with a>0.5, i.e. democracy). It wasn’t strictly true. Those who know, know. Those who could know need to be thaught. A large part of A may need management rather than the truth.Mar 14, 2019, 1:29 PMJWarren PrescottCurt Doolittle – this is going to take awhile to absorb…thank you for your hard work and efforts.Mar 14, 2019, 1:30 PMCurt Doolittlethanks for appreciating those efforts.Mar 14, 2019, 1:33 PMScott Schroederhttps://www.facebook.com/ARIACWFAW/posts/664656660592463Mar 14, 2019, 3:40 PMCurt Doolittleexcept that its the warrior caste that invented and practiced reciprocity -and that the other classes had to also in order to be free as well. so it was not how classes consrains, but the law of the aristicracy imposed upon the other classes.Mar 14, 2019, 3:43 PMScott SchroederCurt Doolittle The warrior class and merchant class today are both COMPLETELY subservient to the modern priest class. The priest class rules through psychological operations. They couldn’t care less about what is true or fair. Every claim is evaluated on its political utility, not on whether it is consistent with reality. All heresy must be silenced. The truth is no defense.Mar 14, 2019, 3:51 PMCurt Doolittlethe point is reciprocity not nap.Mar 14, 2019, 3:51 PMScott SchroederCurt Doolittle You’re saying when the warrior class/aristocracy was in charge they used reciprocity, not NAP. OK. But they’re not in charge now. And the moral and legal constraints put on the merchant class and the warrior class today sure look a lot like NAP. No comparable restraint has been put on the modern priest class and it needs to be.Mar 14, 2019, 4:03 PMCurt DoolittleNo. NAP looks like another semitic (abrahamic, marxist, libertarian, postmodern) pretense to reciprocity and rule of law, that (a) does not require reciprocity be earned, (b) retains the semitic means of deceit by fraud by omission enabling blackmail, enabling conspiracy, (c) (d) continuing the semitic method of baiting well meaning fools into hazard thru piplup and deceit.

NAP is to Reciprocity as Labor Theory of Value is to Subjective Value, and as money proper is to money substitutes – it’s another fraud.

Other things may look like reciprocity. But they are not. They are all substitutes for reciprocity because they are means of circumventing reciprocity. So since they are all worse than reciprocity, one must answer the question why one seeks something less than reciprocity, and as such why one seeks to preserve means of irreciprocity.

I mean, we know why our ancient enemy wants to preserve irreciprocity – to preserve parasitism upon the productive people.Mar 14, 2019, 4:44 PMScott SchroederCurt Doolittle NAP is not the major issue to me. Whatever you call them, restraints have been put on the warrior and merchant class that force then to work for the common good, somewhat. You can’t use your superior strength to take what you want. You can’t burn down a competitor’s warehouse or lie about them. You can’t have a monopoly (unless it has been authorized by the priest class). The modern priest class is in power and they have no restraints.Mar 14, 2019, 4:56 PMChristian KalafutWhen am I going to get my 3,000 page minimum tome of Propertarianism Curt Doolittle?Mar 15, 2019, 1:17 AMCurt DoolittleYou? Never. I”m going to make sure you never get a copy. lolMar 15, 2019, 7:57 AMChristian KalafutMeanMar 15, 2019, 12:24 PMTHE PERIODIC TABLE OF SPEECH

There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism

1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence

2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars)

3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime

4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation)

5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests).

-update-

(correct link to pdf version:

https://propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/periodic-table-of-speech-draft2.pdf )