SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY – REFERENCES 1. Buss DM. Psychological sex differ

SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY – REFERENCES

1. Buss DM. Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. Am Psychol. 1995;50:164–168. [PubMed]

2. Del Giudice M. On the real magnitude of psychological sex differences. Evol Psychol. 2009;7:264–279.

3. Eagly AH. The science and politics of comparing women and men. Am Psychol. 1995;50:145–158.

4. Eagly AH, Wood W. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Am Psychol. 1999;54:408–423.

5. Ellis L, Hershberger S, Field E, Wersinger S, Pellis S, et al. Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press; 2008.

6. Fausto-Sterling A. Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men (2nd ed.) New York: Basic Books; 1992.

7. Geary DC. Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.

8. Halpern DF, Benbow CP, Geary DC, Gur RC, Hyde JS, et al. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007;8:1–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

9. Hyde JS. The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol. 2005;60:581–592. [PubMed]

10. Lippa RA. The gender reality hypothesis. Am Psychol. 2006;61:639–640. [PubMed]

11. Lippa RA. Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why? Pers Soc Psychol Compass. 2010;3:1–13.

12. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1974.

13. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.

14. Hedges LV. What are effect sizes and why do we need them? Child Dev Perspect. 2008;2:167–171.

15. Davies APC, Shackelford TK. Two human natures: How men and women evolved different psychologies. In: Crawford C, Krebs D, editors. Foundations of evolutionary psychology. New York: Erlbaum; 2008. pp. 261–280.

16. Schmitt DP, Realo A, Voracek M, Allik J. Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94:168–182. [PubMed]

17. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1972. pp. 136–179.

18. Kokko H, Jennions M. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol. 2008;21:919–948. [PubMed]

19. Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Evolutionary psychology and feminism. Sex Roles. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3.

20. Ashton MC, Lee K, Pozzebon JA, Visser BA, Worth NC. Status-driven risk taking and the major dimensions of personality. J Res Pers. 2010;44:734–737.

21. Bourdage JS, Lee K, Ashton MC, Perry A. Big Five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality. Pers Indiv Diff. 2007;43:1506–1516.

22. Del Giudice M, Angeleri R, Brizio A, Elena MR. The evolution of autistic-like and schizotypal traits: A sexual selection hypothesis. Front Psychol. 2010;1:41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

23. Haselton MG, Miller GF. Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Hum Nat. 2006;17:50–73. [PubMed]

24. Jonason PK, Li NP, Webster GD, Schmitt DP. The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. Eur J Pers. 2009;23:5–18.

25. Lee K, Ogunfowora B, Ashton MC. Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? J Pers. 2005;73:1437–1463. [PubMed]

26. Markey PM, Markey CN. The interpersonal meaning of sexual promiscuity. J Res Pers. 2007;41:1199–1212.

27. Miller GF, Tal IR. Schizotypy versus openness and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Schizophr Res. 2007;93:317–324. [PubMed]

28. Nettle D, Clegg H. Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2006;273:611–615. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

29. Schmitt DP. The big five related to risky sexual behavior across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. Eur J Pers. 2004;18:301–319.

30. Schmitt DP, Buss DM. Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the big five? J Res Pers. 2000;34:141–177.

31. Schmitt DP, Shackelford TK. Big five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evol Psychol. 2008;6:246–282.

32. Bentler PM, Newcomb MD. Longitudinal study of marital success and failure. J Consult Clin Psych. 1978;46:1053–1070.

33. Kelly EL, Conley JJ. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:27–40. [PubMed]

34. Nettle D. Individual differences. In: Dunbar R, Barrett L, editors. Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 479–490.

35. Wiebe RP. Delinquent behavior and the five-factor model: Hiding in the adaptive landscape. Indiv Diff Res. 2004;2:38–62.

36. Hyde JS. Gender similarities still rule. Am Psychol. 2006;61:641–642. [PubMed]

37. Costa PTJ, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. J Pers Assess. 1995;64:21–50. [PubMed]

38. Ashton MC, Lee K. Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11:150–166. [PubMed]

39. Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM, Joireman J, Teta P, Kraft M. A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:757–768.

40. DeYoung CG. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91:1138–1151. [PubMed]

41. Digman JM. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73:1246–1256. [PubMed]

42. Musek J. A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. J Res Pers. 2007;41:1213–1235.

43. Just C. A review of literature on the general factor of personality. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;50:765–771.

44. Rushton JP, Irwing P. The general factor of personality: Normal and abnormal. In: Chamorro-Premuzic T, von Stumm S, Furnham A, editors. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences. London: Blackwell; 2011.

45. Saucier G. What are the most important dimensions of personality? Evidence from studies of descriptors in diverse languages. Pers Soc Psychol Compass. 2009;3:620–637.

46. DeYoung CG, Quilty LC, Peterson JB. Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;93:880–896. [PubMed]

47. Cattell RB, Cattell HEP. Personality Structure and the new Fifth Edition of the 16PF. Educ Psychol Meas. 1995;55:926–937.

48. Cattell HEP, Mead AD. The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH, editors. The Sage Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Personality Measurement and Testing. London: Sage; 2008.

49. Costa PTJ, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81:322–331. [PubMed]

50. Hough LM, Oswald FL, Ployhart RE. Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. Int J Select Assess. 2001;9:152–194.

51. Lucas RE, Deiner E, Grob A, Suh EM, Shao L. Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79:452–468. [PubMed]

52. Powell DM, Goffin RD, Gellatly IR. Gender differences in personality scores: Implications for differential hiring rates. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;50:106–110.

53. Weisberg YJ, DeYoung CG, Hirsh JB. Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Front Psychol. 2011;2:178. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

54. Booth T, Irwing P. Sex differences in the 16PF5, test of measurement invariance and mean differences in the US standardisation sample. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;50:553–558.

55. Soto CJ, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100:330–348. [PubMed]

56. French BF, Finch WH. Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2006;13:378–402.

57. Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 1993;58:525–543.

58. Widaman KF, Reise KF. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In: Bryant KJ, Windle M, editors. The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. pp. 281–324.

59. Church AT, Burke PJ. Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big 5 and Tellegen’s 3-dimensional and 4-dimensional models. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:93–114. [PubMed]

60. Harner EJ, Whitmore RC. Multivariate measures of niche overlap using discriminant analysis. Theor Popul Biol. 1977;12:21–36. [PubMed]

61. Reiser B. Confidence intervals for the Mahalanobis distance. Commun Stat-Simul C. 2001;30:37–45.

62. Zou GY. Exact confidence interval for Cohen’s effect size is readily available. Stat Med. 2007;26:3054–3056. [PubMed]

63. Huberty CJ. Mahalanobis distance. In: Everitt BS, Howell DC, editors. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Chichester: Wiley; 2005.

64. De Maesschalck R, Jouan-Rimbaud D, Massart DL. The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2000;50:1–18.

65. Noftle EE, Shaver PR. Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. J Res Pers. 2006;40:179–208.

66. Merz EL, Roesch SC. A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: modeling trait interactions. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;51:915–919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

67. Conn SR, Rieke ML, editors. The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Champagne, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc; 1994.

68. Rossier J, Meyer de Stadelhofen F, Berthoud S. The hierarchical structures of the NEO PI-R and the 16 PF 5. Eur J Pers Assess. 2004;20:27–38.

69. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2010. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/

70. Archer J. Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behav Brain Sci. 2009;32:249–266. [PubMed]

71. Biernat M. Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. Am Psychol. 2003;58:1019–1027. [PubMed]


Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 10:25:00 UTC

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *