photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47460782_10156829220882264_452702558

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47460782_10156829220882264_452702558159372288_o_10156829220877264.jpg Even if the illustration is a poor analogy, it does get the point across that constant relations may remain constant across inconstant (inconsistent, incompatible, incommensurable) theories, paradigms, sciences(frames). (The illustration is consistent, compatible, commensurable.)John EdwardIt depends on whether the theory is predictive or not. If the theory has predictive value (for instance, “global warming” has zero predictive value as a theory), it’s worthwhile and approximates the truth.Dec 6, 2018, 11:53 PMEven if the illustration is a poor analogy, it does get the point across that constant relations may remain constant across inconstant (inconsistent, incompatible, incommensurable) theories, paradigms, sciences(frames). (The illustration is consistent, compatible, commensurable.)