“the power of “good speech” to overcome “bad speech”.”— This is empirically fa

–“the power of “good speech” to overcome “bad speech”.”—
This is empirically false in all information markets: attention is garnered by bads, we practice shaming for status, we practice altruistic punishment for moral violations, and it is cheaper to lie than to correct a lie.


Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:33:52 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059061165114966016

Reply addressees: @JeffreyASachs

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058413773789249536


IN REPLY TO:

@JeffreyASachs

And if that’s an accurate description of psych, why are psychologists so optimistic about the potential for democratic discourse and deliberation? One would expect them to be the least confident in the power of “good speech” to overcome “bad speech”.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058413773789249536

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *