Continuing: –“..respect [for] western classics…”–. Does not include the prop

Continuing: –“..respect [for] western classics…”–. Does not include the proposition (that Hicks or I would state) that this technique (Pilpul) is what separates anglo law, philosophy, and science, from platonism and continental ‘literary philosophy’ which rebelled against it.


Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 21:04:39 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055565826785468416

Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968


IN REPLY TO:

@Jonas_Ceika

@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *