CLOSE 10) This is indifferent from the debate over ‘creativity in legal interpre

CLOSE 10) This is indifferent from the debate over ‘creativity in legal interpretation’ in the supreme court, versus the law says only what it obviously says in the context it was written for the purpose it was written: One Shall Not (in the jewish tradition) attempt To FIT Data.


Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 21:26:26 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055571308493324290

Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968


IN REPLY TO:

@Jonas_Ceika

@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *