(a) Is that what I am saying? And (b) Why would anyone read either theology or philosophy in the age of math, logic, sciences, economics, law, history, and literature – each of which is less vulnerable to fraud and confirmation bias, than sophism (philosophy) and magic(theology)?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 22:16:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055583878067482624
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055565599517167618
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@curtdoolittle @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN So are you saying that rigorously interpreting a text is by definition pilpul and therefore bad? How do you read philosophy then?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055565599517167618
Leave a Reply