15) So your ‘list of excuses-of-intent’ by stating ‘quotes of intent’ are just a

15) So your ‘list of excuses-of-intent’ by stating ‘quotes of intent’ are just attempts to perpetuate the dysgenic, defeatist, destructive, fraud, of using sophisticated lies (sophisms, supernaturalisms, pseudosciences) to appeal to sentiments as a means of obtaining power.


Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:35:41 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055452843015061504

Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @WorMartiN

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680


IN REPLY TO:

@Jonas_Ceika

@curtdoolittle @WorMartiN You also end by saying one should study law, not literature. First off, I don’t study literature. Secondly, how is that an argument? And how is if Marx is liable for murder at all relevant to my points? I’m genuinely confused.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *