Different issue. Closing for seismic vulnerability is one thing. We still have n

Different issue. Closing for seismic vulnerability is one thing. We still have no viable alternative to nuclear reactors and all evidence is that no other competitor is on the horizon. We can’t afford to police int’l trade any longer. Either power or 40% decline in std of living.


Source date (UTC): 2018-10-15 23:23:45 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1051976956697292801

Reply addressees: @PaulEich11 @ShellenbergerMD

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1051975001811771393


IN REPLY TO:

@PaulEich11

@ShellenbergerMD @curtdoolittle Sits on land covered in geological faults next to the ocean which could be engulfed by a tsunami. What could go wrong? Fukushima anyone? The Japanese still haven’t cleaned that one up and it continues to spew radioactive poison into the Pacific and it has reached California.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1051975001811771393

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *