photos_and_videos/Intelligence_10156432685457264/35514206_10156432756542264_6332

photos_and_videos/Intelligence_10156432685457264/35514206_10156432756542264_6332558570734747648_n_10156432756537264.jpg FROM HUMAN ACCOMPLISHMENT

“THE BIG FOUR”

Percentage of relevant articles listing contributions from a country.

In other words, Lotharingia is absurdly prolific.إبراهيم العقيدWhat is the title of this graph please ?

What is standard for ?Jun 20, 2018 9:43amCurt Doolittleone second…Jun 20, 2018 9:59amCurt DoolittleFrom Human Accomplishment. Number of cross references (citations) of innovators from countries.Jun 20, 2018 10:06amإبراهيم العقيدThank you.Jun 20, 2018 10:23amAaron KahlandI haven’t read this work but I’m curious to how he has defined ‘significant’.

Further, this is a quantitative exercise – not qualitative. E.g. France has no Michaelangelo.

If accomplishment is a qualitative measure – which it must surely must be – Murray is calculating rather primitively.Jun 20, 2018 11:34amCurt Doolittletake a look at his methodology – it’s the first part of the book. at the very least it’s neutral. But it’s hard to argue with.Jun 20, 2018 1:10pmAaron Kahland@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] will readJun 20, 2018 1:44pmBjorn MoritzSo, basically all the Germanic people.Jun 20, 2018 3:38pmChris@[1420794899:2048:Aaron Kahland] Plus its easy to frame an argument when you use time limited stats. The scope and scale of relative human accomplishment in all branches of academia is easily unparalleled by the ancient Greeks. Curt conveniently left out the reference date in his post ;)Jun 20, 2018 9:41pm