In other words you’re fallacy is in the suggestion that both arguments are of eq

In other words you’re fallacy is in the suggestion that both arguments are of equal scope, and equal falsifiability. They aren’t. At all.


Source date (UTC): 2018-05-12 16:58:04 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995347388280786944

Reply addressees: @thousanth_man

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995347198538809350


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@thousanth_man Cost and parsimony are required for tests of science that are not required for tests of scripture (cost, limits, and parsimony are absent from rationalist and theological argument). A Creator requires: cost, limit, parsimony, the time problem, and infinite regress. No chance.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/995347198538809350


IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@thousanth_man Cost and parsimony are required for tests of science that are not required for tests of scripture (cost, limits, and parsimony are absent from rationalist and theological argument). A Creator requires: cost, limit, parsimony, the time problem, and infinite regress. No chance.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/995347198538809350

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *