photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32104853_10156344981017264_48439923

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/32104853_10156344981017264_4843992364152258560_o_10156344981007264.jpg CURT, WHY DID YOU POST THIS?

—“I’m curious as to the reason you posted this. Volunaryists are the weakest of the AnCap betas.”—Richard Heathen

TO SEED A CONVERSATION ABOUT VIOLENCE.

—“of course in this is our defeat. Until we change this frame we will not survive against the east. We think there is a thing called “peace”. That when people are not actively being violent that means you r not at war, therefore at peace. War is politics by other means.

Everyone else sees politics as war by other means, and knows that war is the only state of being. Evolution: competition for limited resources.

War is the only thing that exists. There is war that is violent and war that isn’t violent but it is all war.”— Greg Hamilton

THERE WE GO. WE GOT THE ANSWER.

BUT WE ALSO GOT THIS REMINDER….

–” Does Scandinavia have to use violence to provide social goods? The same can be said of National Socialist Germany. Whites have a way of working together that does not end in misery and bloodshed.”—Tyler Karl Lia

^Why is it that a few very small countries on the edge of the world can do this?

(image old, but shard via Jake McCauley)John KunkelbrilliantMay 09, 2018 10:53pmConnor CreeganI like the dripping blood.May 09, 2018 10:59pmPatrick QuinlanLolberg meme circa 2012 thoMay 09, 2018 11:00pmJoseph RossIt should be noted that Jake thinks that child prostitution is a good thing. He didn’t make the case “what if the child consents?” He made the case “the child should consent.”May 09, 2018 11:02pmIgor RogovSomething is missing here. “Moral coherence” I would say.

Example: Australian aboriginals did not have a concept of private property as such back in 17th century. So when European settlers tried to establish caches of supply, aboriginals would happily take whatever they want – peacefully and without second thought.

Yet Europeans responded with violence.

Both sides were within their voluntarian “right”, yet as a whole they were totally incoherent.

Violence is inevitable in these situations (and I am not advocating for violence, but just stating it is an inevitable outcome).

To summarise – the voluntarists would use violence against peaceful people who are incoherent with their moral code, even if they don’t have any intention to do so. Voluntary relationships between two morally incoherent parties are not to mutual benefit while some benefit is desired by both parties.

Enforcement of moral coherence is absolutely inevitable.

Life would be generally peaceful if moral coherence is observed and nurtured in a local population, even if it is a cannibal population, peacefully eating other people.May 09, 2018 11:03pmTyler Karl LiaDoes Scandinavia have to use violence to provide social goods? The same can be said of National Socialist Germany. Whites have a way of working together that does not end in misery and bloodshed.May 09, 2018 11:09pmBill JoslinLet’s see… Negativa

Context:

Man in nature = man in society

State of nature = Violence

Man in a state of nature = interpersonal violence

In this light the metric changes from:

“I will use violence against innocent people for…”

To

“What application of violence produces innocent people”

Or ‘i will stay peaceful until X is threatened”May 09, 2018 11:13pmGreg Hamiltonof course in this is our defeat. Until we change this frame we will not survive against the east. We think there is a thing called “peace”. That when people are not actively being violent that means you r not at war, therefore at peace. War is politics by other means.

Everyone else sees politics as war by other means, and knows that war is the only state of being. Evolution: competition for limited resources.

War is the only thing that exists. There is war that is violent and war that isn’t violent but it is all war.May 09, 2018 11:13pmGreg Hamiltonspies, technology theft, buying politicians, hacking, disruption of markets, money manipulation, population displacement; all are acts of war. A truly moral people would kill everyone that does these things to them until they stop doing themMay 09, 2018 11:15pmGreg HamiltonI love the “I don’t advocate violence” statements. Why?May 09, 2018 11:19pmJorn Birx”I don’t condone violence.” he says, as his daughter is being gang-raped by immigrants. “If we fight back against those trying to kill us, they win.”May 09, 2018 11:24pmGeorge Anthony IIPeople who refuse to act violently will always be subjugated by those who are willing to use violence.May 09, 2018 11:42pmDarren O’ConnorCurt, you posted something gay by accident.May 09, 2018 11:44pmKaiser SchimdtWhat’s the next step after total socialism? That’s where I’m at.May 10, 2018 2:34amRyan McRothbard’s taintMay 10, 2018 6:13amGilberto CarlosIt’s only gay if you support it.May 10, 2018 6:26amCurt DoolittleExactly. lolMay 10, 2018 6:52amCurt Doolittlewell done.May 10, 2018 6:52amCurt DoolittleCorrect. Well done.May 10, 2018 6:53amCurt Doolittle—“in this is our defeat”—

THATS THE ANSWER I WAS LOOKING FORMay 10, 2018 6:53amCurt DoolittleYeah, read the comments. I got the responses I was looking for. ;)May 10, 2018 6:54amCurt DoolittleTotal Communism (Slavery)May 10, 2018 6:54amDarren O’ConnorOh, I know. Just throwing my own smartassery in :)May 10, 2018 7:02amEli HarmanThen total cannibalism. Don’t eat anything that ISN’T human.May 10, 2018 8:35amCURT, WHY DID YOU POST THIS?

—“I’m curious as to the reason you posted this. Volunaryists are the weakest of the AnCap betas.”—Richard Heathen

TO SEED A CONVERSATION ABOUT VIOLENCE.

—“of course in this is our defeat. Until we change this frame we will not survive against the east. We think there is a thing called “peace”. That when people are not actively being violent that means you r not at war, therefore at peace. War is politics by other means.

Everyone else sees politics as war by other means, and knows that war is the only state of being. Evolution: competition for limited resources.

War is the only thing that exists. There is war that is violent and war that isn’t violent but it is all war.”— Greg Hamilton

THERE WE GO. WE GOT THE ANSWER.

BUT WE ALSO GOT THIS REMINDER….

–” Does Scandinavia have to use violence to provide social goods? The same can be said of National Socialist Germany. Whites have a way of working together that does not end in misery and bloodshed.”—Tyler Karl Lia

^Why is it that a few very small countries on the edge of the world can do this?

(image old, but shard via Jake McCauley)