2) but those windfalls, the temporary lifting of the underclasses into middle class consumption post civil- and world-war because of them, created too much incentive for those against meritocracy – and they sought under marxism, and postmodernism to use US openness to destroy it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 15:44:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/990980209053782017
Reply addressees: @HbdNrx @SRCHicks
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/990979430792253440
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@HbdNrx @SRCHicks 1) The USA proposed a ‘Third Way’ (meritocracy), but that “third way” is very hard for the underclasses, who want to restore the old. Fiat money, Scale, Wealth from selling off a conquered continent, inheritance of the british empire and german science, created windfalls …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/990979430792253440
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@HbdNrx @SRCHicks 1) The USA proposed a ‘Third Way’ (meritocracy), but that “third way” is very hard for the underclasses, who want to restore the old. Fiat money, Scale, Wealth from selling off a conquered continent, inheritance of the british empire and german science, created windfalls …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/990979430792253440
Leave a Reply