Um. My view is that women’s social priorities and sensitivities are often in con

Um. My view is that women’s social priorities and sensitivities are often in conflict with any organization that they participate in. Men are just far less ‘influenced’ by those sensitivities and priorities, which turns out to be the reason women prefer working for (competent) men: they insulate the workplace from women’s baser instincts.

Water will find a way through any wall. I tend to view women’s intuitions as shit testing everyone until the walls fall apart. The only way that women are truly safe is if they can’t break the wall. Ergo, I am not sure men need to tell women what to do, as much as prevent them from defecting and undermining to the point where the wall may fracture.

Men have different behaviors which are largely masked by marriage (redistribution of females). Without that arrangement, there is always a surplus of men, and while women are dangerous in the long term. ANGRY MEN EVEN IN VERY SMALL NUMBERS ARE VERY DANGERS IN EVERY SINGLE MOMENT.

Hence the universal religious attempt to pair us off.

Men think more, women feel more, and there is value in both techniques.It’s when we limit eachother not command each other that we make the optimum use of those intuitions.