But that does not mean that while the categories relations and values that they discuss in mathematics cannot be restated in scientific “true” operational prose. It’s just that when you do so the triviality of mathematics and the pseudoscientific content of the prose is obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 17:09:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973969391560863745
Reply addressees: @ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973969091013771264
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman And so just as metalsmiths talked about spirits, astrologers talked about gods and demigods, theologians talked about god and heaven, mathematicians still make use of archaic ‘fictionalist’ (platonic) prose as did astrologers and theologians.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973969091013771264
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ProfessorLarp @GolfNorman And so just as metalsmiths talked about spirits, astrologers talked about gods and demigods, theologians talked about god and heaven, mathematicians still make use of archaic ‘fictionalist’ (platonic) prose as did astrologers and theologians.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973969091013771264
Leave a Reply