So the truth is that the article is so … amateurish and reliant on straw man (the principle tactic of Critique) that it’s intellectually embarrassing to have to debunk it. But since it’s been passed around today I think I’ll just do my usual thing. -cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:44:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973706399690690562
Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703750379622400
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit And the principle value of that work has been to understand our own strategy and the strategies of all other peoples, so that we can protect ourselves from future Astrologies, Numerologies, theologies, rationalisms, and pseudosciences. And by the same means used in science.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703750379622400
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit And the principle value of that work has been to understand our own strategy and the strategies of all other peoples, so that we can protect ourselves from future Astrologies, Numerologies, theologies, rationalisms, and pseudosciences. And by the same means used in science.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703750379622400
Leave a Reply