DRAFT THE DEANS OF PHILOSOPHY ARE MERELY “SHAMANS V3.0”. AND PHILOSOPHY MAY BE C

DRAFT

THE DEANS OF PHILOSOPHY ARE MERELY “SHAMANS V3.0”. AND PHILOSOPHY MAY BE COMPLETE.

Now that I’ve worked with Acquisitionism, Testimonialism, and Propertarianism so long, it’s actually embarrassing to listen to the Deans of Philosophy talk about almost anything. Some of the heretofore “great minds” sound no better than Priests and Islamists – because in fact, that is all they are: shamans version three (shamans -> priests -> philosophers).

And it’s not because they have ill intentions, but because they were seduced by and trained by others who were also seduced and trained by that technology of deception we call Supernaturalism(shaman), ‘Abrahamism’ (priest), and Idealism(Philosopher). – and they simply know no better. Meanwhile the Jurists carry on, as they have for five thousand years, practicing the only social science that we can demonstrate is practiced ratio-empirically and scientifically: the law of torts.

As our populations increase, and cause and effect increase in distance, and civic and economic cooperation increases in distance, we have had but little choice to resort to intuition.

And there are only three ways to solve that problem.

… 1) Sciences and Skills(Direct Measurement and Training),

… 2) Institutions and Technologies (Procedural and Environmental training and habituation),

… 3) myths and histories (literary and Intuitionistic training and habituation).

And we can speak in the (1) REAL: scientifically, procedurally, and historically – thereby appealing to evidence, and the utility of doing so or not;

Or we can resort to speaking in the (2) IDEAL: by example(how to act), morally(general rules of right and wrong), and Mythically(instructional parable) thereby appealing to norms, and the others who may reject us if we don’t.

Or we can resort to speaking in the (3) SUPERNATURAL – thereby appealing to scary monsters in authority who may harm us or deprive us if we don’t.

Each technique appeals to different incentives using different language, but which of them is ‘true’? Which is analogy? And which is but a ghost story?

Now the problem is, that all of us exist in a matrix of distributions.

I understand the …

… (4) Intuitionistic<->Rational Spectrum of:

{Dream -> Imagination -> Reason-> Calculation};

and the…

… (5) Experiential<->Analytic Spectrum of:

{(female)Psychotic -> solipsistic -> rational -> aspie -> autistic(male)}.

And lastly, I am fairly sure that intelligence is separate from the prey drive, but that the spectrum of…

… (6) Demonstrated Intelligence -> Potential Demonstrated Intelligence…

…is limited by the …

… (7) Experiential(female)<->Analytic(male) spectrum.

And I understand (And this might blow your mind), that those differences are differences in the genetic dominance or weakness of different reward systems of the PREY DRIVE – because after all, all human behavior evolved from exaggerations of the prey drive. It’s all nature had to work with: Prey Drive (including sex drive).

And among humans the selection pressure is either neotonic or its opposite. (Understanding as we must, that humans are *increasing* in aggression in some sub-races, tribes and clans, just a it has been decreasing in others.)

And I understand that dreaming is a cheap way of searching for opportunities, and intuition is a cheap way of reasoning. And that aggression (in the feminine-Semitic) is, unlike its opposite (masculine-WestSlavic), a cheap means of competition. [1]

So the *expensive* method of group evolutionary strategy consists of …

… (8) {Rational, Autistic, West-Slavic and Productive with high investment parenting and low rates of reproduction and high technological achievement},…

… and the cheap method of group evolutionary strategy consists of …

… (9) {Intuitionistic, Experiential, Semitic with high rates of reproduction and low technological achievement}.

And it may not be obvious that (8) and (9) correspond to specializations between the masculine:(8) and feminine:(9) genetic strategies.

The universe is constructed of very, very, simple rules, and very, very, few of them. Evolution operates in predictable ways, by incrementally building upon what it already has to work with. It’s not complicated.

And that leads us to a problem we must solve: just how many humans are in fact capable of reason? Or stated more precisely: of that spectrum of humans who depend upon the spectrum from Pure Intuition <-to-> Pure Reason, what percent of their number are *sufficiently* capable of reason that we can say they rely on reason for their judgements?

The strategy that we operated during out rather rapid and exceptional development was to embrace the real. Only europeans and east asians stood with the real. The Semites, West Asians, Central Asians, Indians and Africans ‘took the mystical’ route.

So here is the core of the problem ( UNDONE : describe how suggestion works during listening )

The question remains whether if Abrahamism had not been in invented by the introduction of greek thought into Jewish animism, creating rabbinical judaism, spawning christianity, spawning that most disastrous of inventions: islam, whether the world would have suffered in a thousand year dark age. Likely not. We have experienced the Bronze age collapse and Dark Age, the Abrahamic Dark Age, and it appears that without some change, we will enter into the second Abrahamic Dark Age, this time not with mysticism, but with pseudoscience and outright lying: Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno(frankfurt), and the French School of Postmodernists, appealing once again to women (feminism), and immigrants into the empire (third worlders.).

SOVEREIGNTY:

“-From Reals to Feels-“:

————————–

Metaphysics: Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.)

Psychology: Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends.

Sociology: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy.

Ethics and Morality: Propertarianism.

Epistemology: Testimonialism.

Law: Reciprocity: The Natural Law of Reciprocity

Politics: Markets in Everything.

Strategy: Transcendence (Agency, Sovereignty, Heroism)

Spirituality: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism, Festival Nationalism.

Aesthetics: Excellence(heroism), Beauty(Plenty), and Commons(Morality[‘good’])

As arrogant as it sounds, I am pretty sure that the philosophical program is complete. Why? Because the limit of man’s ability is the limit of man’s ability. And further refinement would require further refinement of the biological distribution we call ‘man’. And refutation would require a choice of devolution and dysgenia.

So I know it sounds crazy. But I am pretty sure ‘philosophy’ in the sense of the European philosophical project begun by the Europeans, articulated by the Greeks, and operationalized by the Romans (and destroyed by the Abrahamists) is now complete. And everything else is just one lie or another to advance either a dysgenic or parasitic or homicidal or genocidal alternative. And I am pretty certain I can defeat all comers.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

[1] Note: The Japanese have created demonstrably the best society, thanks partially to their island. But excessive neoteny, failure to tolerate truth regardless of cost to the status quo, and their Asiatic language inhibits them – although less than the Chinese. And FWIW: The Africans have evolved for higher sociability, and greater physical hardship, and greater disease resistance, in a survivable, but extremely hostile geography. It is incorrect to assess them otherwise. Our races and subraces and tribes reflect the geographies that we evolved in. )