USE “SOVEREIGNTY AND NATURAL LAW” NOT “LIBERTARIANISM AND RULE OF LAW” I have to

USE “SOVEREIGNTY AND NATURAL LAW” NOT “LIBERTARIANISM AND RULE OF LAW”

I have to ‘correct’ Ricardo if he is using ‘libertarianism’ rather than ‘sovereignty’ out of convenience. Because just like ‘Austrian Economics’ (Mengerianism) has been ruined, the term ‘Liberty’ and “Libertarianism” has been appropriated and ruined.

Mises was justly criticized and dismissed for his ‘Jewish Economics’. I’ve done the same for Rothbard and his “Jewish Libertinism’.

The term liberty originated with the right to preserve local custom over sovereign law. It was a ‘permission’.

Liberty says nothing about the CONTENT of that law.

Sovereignty leaves no CHOICE over the content of law.

ONLY Natural Law can survive the tests of sovereignty.

Propertarianism = Sovereignty = Rule by Militia, by Rule of Law by Natural Law.