IDEOLOGIST, PHILOSOPHER, JUDGE, OR SCIENTIST? Ideology(preference), Philosopher(

IDEOLOGIST, PHILOSOPHER, JUDGE, OR SCIENTIST?

Ideology(preference), Philosopher(good), Judge(True), Scientist (Measurement)

As far as I know:

Ideology = advocating for change within a context, or change of context.

Philosophy = Search for a method of decidability within a given context.

Truth = a method of decidability independent of context: The Law of Dispute Resolution.

Science = taking measurements that remove ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, fictionalism, and deception which are the natural states of man.

I work in Science (defining methods of measurement free of error, bias, wishful-thinking and deceit).

I work in Truth (defining universal methods of decidability)

I work in Philosophy (recommending a preferred organization of society.)

However, some people work only in philosophy, not in truth, or not in science. This list includes almost all philosophers.

I considered myself a scientist, who uses the framework of philosophy, and has united science and philosophy.

I think you must label yourself a scientist (researcher in measurements) or a judge (searcher for decidability), or a philosopher(search for preferences).

I seek to be a judge, in order to prevent harm by philosophers and ideologists. I seek to be a scientist to help me in my judgements. If this casts me as a philosopher, this is a matter of convention. I only state that one philosophy is good or true, and another is bad or false. It is up to others to choose theirs, just as it is up to me to choose mine.