Mathematics and logic make use of platonism (idealism) to a degree that is painf

Mathematics and logic make use of platonism (idealism) to a degree that is painful, but it is translatable into scientific prose if you understand the foundations (causal relations) that constitute both math and logic.

Now, it is one thing to move from the descriptive (scientific) to the ideal (supernormal), and quite another to move from the ideal (supernormal) to the experiential(phenomenological), and from the phenomenological to the supernatural and occult (abrahamic or religious surrender of reason).

I mean, at some point you’re creating deception value rather than truth value. And while I we need analogy, and we can use ideal to substitute for knowledge when the ideal is demonstrable as a general rule – after that, everything starts moving from truth value, to meaning-value, into deception value.

And I just dont’ understand why we should accept anything communicated in the realm of deception value.