WON’T ABRAHAMISTS JUST CHANGE STRATEGY AGAIN? —“Just curious..I’m sure you’ve

WON’T ABRAHAMISTS JUST CHANGE STRATEGY AGAIN?

—“Just curious..I’m sure you’ve worked this out already. But….So, how can we be so sure that Abrahamism won’t change its strategy again, adapt, and learn how to fight back through parasitism once again after we’ve implemented a new way through your philosophy for all time?”— Adam Walker

Very good question.

There is a basic logic of all communication that is reducible to a set of ‘measurements’ that allows us to construct a language (terms) and grammar that make it very difficult to state falsehoods. (this is primarily what Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism provide)

And given that we understand this grammar, we can also show how suggestion can be created by a series of related statements through unstated but intermediary consequences (suggestive deductions).

It is very hard to construct lies via that intermediary means of suggestion. I suspect people will try to invent some method, but I think it’s going to be as easy to defeat as religious arguments are today.

There is a limit to human cognitive ability which is why game theory is of such limited value beyond the second or third order. Just as there is a limit to the number of chess moves a human seems to be able to rationally consider in advance of play.

So to translate that, it means it is extremely difficult to construct a lie that ordinary people can be fooled by if we make it difficult to do so beyond the third order.

I hope that is enough to make sense (knowing you I suspect it is.)