WE NEED A CHURCH, BUT ONE FREE OF LIES I see the church as desperately clinging

WE NEED A CHURCH, BUT ONE FREE OF LIES

I see the church as desperately clinging to middle eastern dogma instead of seizing the opportunity to teach a mixture of aryan transcendence, christian commercial ethics, and stoic and buddhist mental discipline. In my experience prayer can provide the same benefits as stoicism and buddhism but the problem is that it requires a lie. Whereas buddhism and stoicism do not require lies.

I talk to god every day. You would not imagine how great an influence my god has on my life. While empirical, I am not (like my sister) a stoic. Instead, I practice prayer myself because it is what I know how to do well – but then, my concept of god is so esoteric it may not mean the same thing even if it fulfills the same function.

I see no incompatibility between Aryanism and the church. Nor between our ancient nature worship and the church. I see a weakness in a religion without institutions (paganism). My preference is that the church reform FURTHER in favor of Aryanism than it did in the reformation. And further than the Germans tried to do with the second enlightenment in the 1800’s. Because we need a church that institutionalizes those values across eons and has no other purpose.

For those who don’t understand, Aryanism refers to the initial value system that moved westward with the Kurgans (Yamnaya) and formed the uniqueness of western civilization: Personal Sovereignty. Truthful speech. Public heroism. Political(spiritual) Transcendence.