THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR AGGRESSION We can measure the higher and lower morality o

THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR AGGRESSION

We can measure the higher and lower morality of groups by the scope of property that they protect from parasitism – non-reciprocity.

(see “Incremental Suppression”)

it is always moral for a more moral order of people to aggress against a less moral order of people for the purposes of increasing the less moral order’s ability to conduct reciprocally beneficial results.

(“Investment in the production of reciprocity”)

If it is affordable, it is immoral to fail to aggress against a less moral order of people for the purpose of increasing the less moral order’s ability to conduct reciprocally beneficial results. Otherwise one passes the cost to future generations, and increases the risk that in a period of shock or weakness the less moral people may cause either or both a decline in property, or a decline in morality of the more moral people.

(“Defense against the deceit of claiming conviction when one is practicing mere convenience: externalizing costs to others.”)

As far as I know, arguing against this position cannot be done except by the non-reciprocal export of costs upon others. In other words, the failure to aggress against immoral orders can only be explained by immoral actions.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine